COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE HASUSA, IGBO AND YORUBA SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT DURING PRE-COLONIAL ERA

The cultural, social, and political environments of the Hausa, Igbo, and Yoruba peoples each contributed to the development of their own unique forms of administration prior to colonization. Their respective governmental structures are contrasted and compared below.

Hausa System of Government

The majority of modern-day Nigeria’s northern region is home to the Hausa people, who historically established a unified government. They had a centralized government in the form of city-states, with Sarkin kings at the helm. The Sarkin oversaw the three departments of government: executive, legislative, and judicial. The Madawaki were a council of ministers that aided him in running the government. Despite their frequent rivalry, the Hausa city-states had much in common, including a similar language, culture, and religion (Islam).

Igbo System of Government

The Igbo people, who now live primarily in southern Nigeria, historically operated under a more decentralized political structure. Each of their self-sufficient settlements was ruled by a council of elders known as the Nze na Ozo. Members of the council were selected because of their experience, seniority, and prominence in the community. Because of this fear of a single person or group amassing too much power, the Igbo political system was built on a set of checks and balances rather than a monarchy. Decisions were determined by majority vote under their democratic form of government.

Yoruba System of Government

The Yoruba, who lived predominantly in what is now southern Nigeria, had a centralized administration, not unlike that of the Hausa. Each of these kingdoms was controlled by an Oba, or king. The Oba was the highest official in all three branches of government. The Oyomesi, a council of chiefs under his command, oversaw many aspects of administration. Despite their frequent rivalry, the Yoruba kingdoms all spoke the same language and practiced the same religion (traditional Yoruba religion).

In conclusion, both the Hausa and Yoruba governmental systems were centralized, with monarchs and ministerial or chieftain councils at their helm. The Igbo, on the other hand, had a decentralized form of governance in which independent villages were ruled by councils of elders. Igbo people adopted a more democratic type of administration based on agreement, whereas the Hausa and Yoruba shared a common religion that affected their political systems.