WhatsApp or SMS: 07087083227
Click here to Get The Complete Research Project Chapter 1-5

Will Subsidy Removal Favour the Rich or the Poor Citizens?

Subsidy elimination is a contentious topic with several sides. Depending on a number of circumstances, the elimination of subsidies may have varying effects on various socioeconomic categories.

It’s vital to grasp the nature and function of subsidies first. Subsidies are monetary aid provided by the government to certain industries or people in order to lower the cost of production or consumption. They are frequently enacted to foster economic expansion, back certain industries, or aid the needy.

There are arguments on both sides of the debate about how removing subsidies will affect the country’s wealthy and poor. Some claim that low-income people would be hit more by subsidy cuts since they use subsidised items and services more frequently. In the case of low-income people who rely significantly on public transit, a rise in transportation expenses caused by, say, the elimination of fuel subsidies, can have a devastating effect.

However, some who support doing away with subsidies say it might help the poor in the long term. Subsidies, they say, cause inefficiencies and market distortions that slow economic growth and development. The removal of subsidies is based on the belief that freeing up market forces will boost competition, decrease prices, and benefit all residents, especially the poor.

It’s worth noting, though, that the impacts of subsidy elimination can range from minimal to severe, depending on the circumstances and the preventative steps taken. The negative effects on the poor can be lessened, for instance, if subsidy reduction is paired with targeted social safety nets or other alternative support systems.

In conclusion, there is no simple answer to the issue of whether the affluent or the poor would benefit from the elimination of subsidies. It’s a tricky problem that calls for analysis of many angles. It has been proposed that eliminating subsidies might have a bigger short-term impact on the poor but long-term advantages for all residents. To what extent the elimination of subsidies benefits certain people over others is ultimately dependent on the policies and mechanisms put in place to mitigate any unintended repercussions.

You can also check other Research here: