WhatsApp or SMS: 07087083227
Click here to Get The Complete Research Project Chapter 1-5

Impact of Kenya Subsidy Removal on the Masses

Kenya, like many other developing nations, is heavily reliant on government policies and interventions to shape its economic environment. Subsidies, which are government financial supports meant to promote economic growth and safeguard citizens’ interests, are one such policy. The elimination of these subsidies, however, may have far-reaching consequences for the general populace. The purpose of this paper is to assess the results of eliminating subsidies in Kenya.

The Kenyan administration has argued that eliminating subsidies is essential for the country’s economic progress and stability, while others have countered that doing so will have a disproportionately negative impact on the country’s poor and vulnerable citizens. Agriculture, transportation, and education are just some of the industries that benefit from the subsidised rates.

The rising cost of farming inputs as a result of subsidy cuts has contributed to rising food prices in the agriculture industry. This has had a profound effect on the general populace, especially on those living in rural regions who depend so largely on farming for their income. Urban residents have also been hit hard by rising food costs due to the rising cost of living.

Another major factor is the elimination of gasoline subsidies. The rising cost of gasoline has a knock-on impact on the cost of transporting products and services, which in turn drives up their pricing. Many households in Kenya have seen their already tight finances become even tighter as a result of this.

The elimination of subsidies in the education sector has reduced access to higher education for many, especially those from low-income households. This may have far-reaching consequences for the country’s future human capital and economic prosperity.

The elimination of subsidies in Kenya has had a profound effect on the general populace, resulting to higher prices and less access to necessities like education. It is evident that more has to be done to protect the most disadvantaged from the negative impacts of these policies, notwithstanding the government’s claims that they are essential to economic progress. To cushion the blow of these shifts on the most vulnerable, it may be necessary to offer targeted subsidies or increase funding for social safety nets.

You can also check other Research here: